In one of my last posts, I argued for looking out for ancestor-descendant relationships when putting up an evolutionary hypothesis based on fossil data. In this post, I will explore a bit the background of individual-based phylogenies and why we should keep in mind population processes, when analysing such data sets.
May the bridges I burned today light the way to those I'll burn tomorrow – A blog for lost scientists and curious non-scientists.
Labels
#FightTheFog
(19)
ancestors
(3)
animals
(3)
artwork
(9)
Austria
(2)
bad science
(11)
Beall's legacy
(7)
bias
(4)
biogeography
(5)
branch support
(4)
Bundestagswahl
(9)
comment
(19)
curiosities
(2)
data links
(3)
European
(10)
evolution
(1)
France
(9)
free science
(5)
funny things
(3)
Germany
(12)
how-to-analyse
(10)
in Deutsch
(32)
infographics
(35)
introduction
(1)
Ireland
(1)
Köppen-Geiger
(3)
Landtagswahlen
(10)
languages
(5)
lost science
(3)
not science
(8)
oddities
(14)
open access
(1)
open data
(3)
palaeontology
(13)
peer review
(10)
people
(1)
Philosophisches
(8)
phylo-networks
(16)
plants
(23)
politics
(34)
pollen
(4)
public interest
(21)
satire
(10)
scam
(5)
science-related
(21)
Sweden
(4)
systematics
(3)
terminology
(5)
tips
(27)
travelling
(2)
USA
(18)
Wahl-O-Mat
(12)
Translate
Showing posts with label animals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label animals. Show all posts
Where have all the ancestors gone?
In contrast to neontologists, palaeontologists deal literally in the past. However, like their modern counterparts, most palaeontologists seem to have the opinion that although we all agree evolution is a fact, we will never have to deal with actual ancestors.
Cats and Dogs – a deep divide, including languages
Rumour has it that there is a fundamental difference between cats and dogs. Linguistically, it’s quite obvious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)