The fragmentation of science makes it more and more difficult to keep up scientific standards. Editors struggle harder and harder to find peers who have the knowledge and time to properly review the papers of others. Hence, in even relatively transparent peer-reviewed journals, the same errors are endlessly repeated. For instance: phylogenetic/-biogeographic studies on Chinese oaks using plastid data.
May the bridges I burned today light the way to those I'll burn tomorrow – A blog for lost scientists and curious non-scientists.
Labels
#FightTheFog
(19)
ancestors
(3)
animals
(3)
artwork
(9)
Austria
(2)
bad science
(11)
Beall's legacy
(7)
bias
(4)
biogeography
(5)
branch support
(4)
Bundestagswahl
(7)
comment
(19)
curiosities
(1)
data links
(3)
European
(10)
evolution
(1)
France
(9)
free science
(5)
funny things
(3)
Germany
(10)
how-to-analyse
(10)
in Deutsch
(31)
infographics
(34)
introduction
(1)
Ireland
(1)
Köppen-Geiger
(3)
Landtagswahlen
(10)
languages
(5)
lost science
(3)
not science
(8)
oddities
(14)
open access
(1)
open data
(3)
palaeontology
(13)
peer review
(10)
people
(1)
Philosophisches
(8)
phylo-networks
(16)
plants
(22)
politics
(31)
pollen
(4)
public interest
(21)
satire
(10)
scam
(5)
science-related
(20)
Sweden
(4)
systematics
(3)
terminology
(5)
tips
(27)
travelling
(2)
USA
(18)
Wahl-O-Mat
(11)