As a 100%-European, I have two citizenships: German (by birth) and Swedish (naturalised). Living in France, this makes me a double expatriate: auslandsdeutsch and utlandssvensk. Because of the upcoming riksdag-elections, I was reminded about a difference: Whereas the small Sweden looks after its expatriates, the big Germany doesn't.
#FightTheFog (14) ancestors (3) animals (3) artwork (6) Austria (2) bad science (5) Beall's legacy (4) bias (2) branch support (3) Bundestagswahl (6) curiosities (1) data links (3) France (9) free science (3) funny things (3) Germany (7) in Deutsch (17) infographics (18) introduction (1) Ireland (1) Köppen-Geiger (3) Landtagswahlen (4) languages (4) lost science (2) not science (7) oddities (10) open access (1) open data (1) palaeontology (9) peer review (9) Philosophisches (2) phylo-networks (10) plants (11) politics (21) public interest (11) satire (8) science-related (13) Sweden (3) terminology (3) tips (14) USA (16) Wahl-O-Mat (3)
Als ehemaliger österreichischer Arbeitnehmer verfolge ich ab und an was im südöstlichen Bruderstaat der Bayern vor sich (und vor die Hunde) geht. Dank der ultrarechten (= lupenrein neoliberalen) autoritären schwarzbraunen Regierung ist Österreich auch wieder politisch interessant geworden.
When it still was completely free, Wolfram Alpha was one of my favorite search engines. Because it would provide me with nerdy data. But when you search your family name, it becomes racist. Not their fault, they just dig all available data.
It may look (to some) like a good idea to take modern-day altitudinal ranges of genera to infer a palaeo-altitude of a fossil plant assemblage using a mutually shared range approach. A fresh example from the purportedly peer-reviewed Elsevier journal Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (PPP).
The Coexistence Approach is a pseudo-science. At least, it's fundamentally flawed in theory and practise. But one journal remains the bastion of true faith. But maybe tides are changing?
BSP pretends to be a proper scientific publisher, and not a predatory one. So, why sending an invitation to become a reviewer of some medicinal journal to a former scientist (see counter on my homepage) that dealt in phylogenetics and palaeobotany?